Survey Results
The Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS) is an assessment of a Medicare Advantage
Organization's ability to maintain or improve the physical and mental health functioning
of its Medicare beneficiaries over a two-year period of time, using the best available
science in functional status and health outcomes measurement. The survey is used
as a way of measuring how the care provided by MAOs is affecting the functional
status of their enrollees. CMS includes the HOS in their performance assessment
program, e.g., HOS results are included in the CMS Five Star Quality and Performance
Rating System for MAOs.
The first cohort of baseline data was collected in 1998. Beginning in 2000, both
a baseline cohort and a follow up cohort were collected. During the most recent
survey administration (2011 Round 14),
Cohort 14 Baseline and
Cohort 12
Follow Up data were collected. The most recently available results are
from the
2010 Cohort 13 Baseline and the
2008-2010 Cohort 11 Performance
Measurement, which combines data from the
2008 Cohort 11 Baseline and
2010
Cohort 11 Follow Up surveys. For further information, please refer to the
survey administration timeline. The following
table depicts general status information, including response rates, for the baseline
and follow up cohorts administered to date.
Medicare HOS Survey Status Information1
|
COHORT
|
DATE
FIELDED
|
POPULATION
|
REPORTING UNITS (MAOs)2
|
SAMPLE SIZE
|
INELIGIBLE SURVEYS3
|
COMPLETED SURVEYS4
|
RESPONSE RATE5
|
|
Cohort 1 Baseline
|
May 1998
|
M+CO
|
287
|
279,135
|
7,196
|
167,096
|
61.4%
|
|
Cohort 1 Follow Up
|
April 2000
|
M+CO
|
188
|
89,332
|
1,203
|
75,593
|
85.8%
|
|
Cohort 2 Baseline
|
March 1999
|
M+CO
PACE
EverCare
|
312
20
6
|
301,184
4,225
5,015
|
8,829
435
655
|
194,378
1,752
1,226
|
66.5%
46.2%
28.1%
|
|
Cohort 2 Follow Up
|
June 2001
|
M+CO
|
160
|
88,468
|
1,539
|
73,015
|
84.0%
|
|
Cohort 3 Baseline
|
April 2000
|
M+CO
PACE
|
306
20
|
298,883
3,831
|
7,662
564
|
208,655
1,672
|
71.6%
51.2%
|
|
Cohort 3 Follow Up
|
May 2002
|
M+CO
|
146
|
87,091
|
1,523
|
65,992
|
77.1%
|
|
Cohort 4 Baseline
|
May 2001
|
M+CO
PACE
|
197
17
|
190,523
3,943
|
6,041
362
|
126,255
1,321
|
68.4%
36.9%
|
|
Cohort 4 Follow Up
|
May 2003
|
M+CO
|
152
|
71,549
|
951
|
55,480
|
78.6%
|
|
Cohort 5 Baseline
|
April 2002
|
M+CO
PACE
|
177
20
|
171,504
4,834
|
5,963
710
|
106,168
1,385
|
64.1%
33.6%
|
|
Cohort 5 Follow Up
|
May 2004
|
MA
|
153
|
74,562
|
1,265
|
58,417
|
80.0%
|
|
Cohort 6 Baseline
|
April 2003
|
M+CO
|
163
|
161,409
|
5,579
|
100,669
|
64.6%
|
|
Cohort 6 Follow Up
|
May 2005
|
MA
|
154
|
69,865
|
854
|
56,075
|
81.3%
|
|
Cohort 7 Baseline
|
March 2004
|
MA
|
161
|
159,311
|
6,777
|
99,649
|
65.3%
|
|
Cohort 7 Follow Up
|
May 2006
|
MA
|
151
|
70,022
|
1,084
|
57,214
|
83.0%
|
|
Cohort 8 Baseline
|
April 2005
|
MA
|
164
|
162,902
|
6,966
|
101,588
|
65.1%
|
|
Cohort 8 Follow Up
|
May 2007
|
MA
|
154
|
66,292
|
1,351
|
53,112
|
81.8%
|
|
Cohort 9 Baseline
|
April 2006
|
MA
|
203
|
188,515
|
7,725
|
120,708
|
66.8%
|
|
Cohort 9 Follow Up
|
May 2008
|
MA
|
187
|
77,669
|
819
|
62,875
|
81.8%
|
|
Cohort 10 Baseline
|
April 2007
|
MA
|
286
|
321,005
|
19,273
|
191,308
|
63.4%
|
|
Cohort 10 Follow Up
|
April 2009
|
MA
|
268
|
114,405
|
2,026
|
93,286
|
83.0%
|
|
Cohort 11 Baseline
|
April 2008
|
MA
|
361
|
414,655
|
18,420
|
233,945
|
59.0%
|
|
Cohort 11 Follow Up
|
April 2010
|
MA
|
330
|
114,733
|
901
|
96,106
|
84.4%
|
|
Cohort 12 Baseline
|
April 2009
|
MA
|
424
|
487,861
|
26,162
|
288,794
|
62.6%
|
|
Cohort 13 Baseline
|
April 2010
|
MA
|
471
|
546,931
|
14,079
|
337,249
|
63.3%
|
UPDATED August 2011
1 Over the course of time, the refinement of the HOS measure has resulted
in changes to the definition of a "completed survey." The information in the table
provides a presentation of how a completed survey and response rate were calculated
at the time of reporting for each of the baseline and follow up cohorts. Given that
the definition of a completed survey has evolved over time, this table should not
be utilized for response rate comparisons across the cohorts. If you are interested
in comparative response rate information, please contact the Medicare HOS Information and Technical
Support Line.
2 For the baseline cohorts, the reporting units represent the individual
MAOs sampled for the survey. However for the follow up cohorts, the reporting units
have been adjusted to accommodate selected MAO consolidations and service area reductions
at the time of performance measurement reporting (which typically occurs in the
year subsequent to the collection of the follow up data).
3 For the baseline cohorts, the ineligible beneficiaries meet one
of the following criteria: deceased; not enrolled in the MAO; have an incorrect
address and phone number; or have a language barrier. For the follow up cohorts,
the ineligible beneficiaries meet one of the following criteria: not enrolled in
the MAO; have an incorrect address and phone number; or have a language barrier.
4 In general, for Cohorts 1, 2, and 3 Baseline a
completed survey is defined as a survey that has at least 80% of the questions answered.
However, beginning with Cohort 1 Follow Up and Cohort 4 Baseline,
a completed survey is defined as a survey that can be used to calculate physical
or mental health summary scores.
5 Please note, ineligible beneficiaries are removed from the denominator
in the response rate calculations. In other words, Response Rate = [Number of Respondents/(Total
Sample - Ineligibles)].
Performance Measurement Analytic Sample
After the administration of each follow up cohort, cohort specific performance measurement
results are calculated. Seniors (age 65 or older) that had a calculatable physical
component summary score or mental component summary score at baseline are eligible
for performance measurement. However, some of these seniors belong to MAOs that
went out of business or discontinued offering managed care between the baseline
and follow up samples. Therefore, the Performance Measurement Analytic Sample is
limited to those seniors who had calculatable physical or mental health summary
scores at baseline and were still enrolled in the same participating MAO at the
time of follow up. Seniors who become deceased between baseline and follow up are
classified as "dead" for purposes of performance measurement. Additionally, a certain
number of seniors will voluntarily disenroll from their MAOs between baseline and
follow up. These seniors are classified as "voluntarily disenrolled" for purposes
of performance measurement. Of the seniors sampled at the time of follow up, a certain
percentage will be determined to be ineligible for inclusion in the sample. These
ineligible seniors are: not enrolled in the MAO; have an incorrect address and phone
number; or have a language barrier. Of the seniors eligible for inclusion in follow
up, those that do not return a completed survey are designated as "non-respondents"
and those that do return a completed survey are referred to as "respondents." The
following table depicts the distribution of the Performance Measurement Analytic
Sample for the completed cohorts to date.
Medicare HOS Performance Measurement Distribution of Sample
|
COHORT
|
YEARS
|
REPORTING UNITS (MAOs)
|
ANALYTIC SAMPLE
|
VOLUNTARILY DISENROLLED
|
DEAD
|
FOLLOW UP INELIGIBLE SURVEYS
|
FOLLOW UP NON-RESPONDENTS
|
FOLLOW UP RESPONDENTS
|
|
Cohort 1
|
1998-2000
|
188
|
122,444
|
31,772
|
8,047
|
1,203
|
11,531
|
71,094
|
|
Cohort 2
|
1999-2001
|
160
|
124,835
|
33,226
|
8,930
|
1,179
|
12,758
|
68,742
|
|
Cohort 3
|
2000-2002
|
146
|
122,317
|
36,503
|
8,987
|
790
|
16,459
|
59,578
|
|
Cohort 4
|
2001-2003
|
152
|
95,565
|
24,589
|
6,998
|
392
|
12,950
|
50,636
|
|
Cohort 5
|
2002-2004
|
153
|
92,434
|
18,603
|
6,993
|
781
|
12,733
|
53,324
|
|
Cohort 6
|
2003-2005
|
154
|
90,154
|
13,550
|
6,739
|
854
|
12,936
|
56,075
|
|
Cohort 7
|
2004-2006
|
151
|
93,631
|
16,251
|
7,358
|
1,084
|
11,724
|
57,214
|
|
Cohort 8
|
2005-2007
|
154
|
95,217
|
21,384
|
7,541
|
1,351
|
11,829
|
53,112
|
|
Cohort 9
|
2006-2008
|
187
|
103,661
|
18,172
|
7,820
|
819
|
13,975
|
62,875
|
|
Cohort 10
|
2007-2009
|
268
|
162,524
|
36,159
|
11,960
|
2,026
|
19,093
|
93,286
|
|
Cohort 11
|
2008-2010
|
330
|
187,530
|
58,310
|
14,487
|
901
|
17,726
|
96,106
|
UPDATED August 2011
Calculating Performance Measurement Results
A performance measurement data set is created by merging a cohort's baseline and
follow up data. Additionally, death information is incorporated into the performance
measurement data set for those baseline respondents who died between baseline and
follow up. The HOS performance measurement results are computed using a rigorous
case mix/risk adjustment model.
There are six main categories of actual health outcomes used in the performance
measurement analysis:
- alive and physical health better;
- alive and physical health the same;
- dead or physical health worse;
- mental health better;
- mental health the same; and
- mental health worse.
Each beneficiary is classified into one of the three physical health categories
and one of the three mental health categories. In calculating expected outcomes,
separate case mix models are warranted for death and for physical component summary
scores and mental component summary scores. A series of six different death models
(formerly eight models), three different physical health models, and three different
mental health models are used, since all beneficiaries do not have data for all
of the independent variables that could be used to calculate an expected score.
In other words, each expected outcome for a beneficiary is derived from the best
fit model, which is based on those variables for which the beneficiary has data.
One model is used for each beneficiary, and there are no predictions made with missing
data.
Beneficiary level results are aggregated to derive the MAO, state, and HOS national
percent better, same, and worse than expected values. Outliers are those MAOs that
performed significantly better (i.e., better than expected) or significantly worse
(i.e., worse than expected) when compared to the national average. The national
average is based on all plans that participated in performance measurement. MAOs
can be outliers on a measure of physical health (which is based on death and the
physical component summary score), or on a measure of mental health (which is based
on the mental component summary score).
Analyses of the two-year performance measurement data have demonstrated that at
the national level there is significant variation among MAOs with respect to both
physical and mental health outcomes. Research has identified differences in outcomes
among specific groups of beneficiaries and potential opportunities to improve care.
The following table depicts the overall performance measurement results by cohort.
Medicare HOS Performance Measurement Results
|
COHORT
|
YEARS
|
TOTAL NUMBER OF REPORTING UNITS (MAOs)
|
MENTAL HEALTH BETTER THAN EXPECTED (MAOs)
|
MENTAL HEALTH WORSE THAN EXPECTED (MAOs)
|
PHYSICAL HEALTH BETTER THAN EXPECTED (MAOs)
|
PHYSICAL HEALTH WORSE THAN EXPECTED (MAOs)
|
|
Cohort 1
|
1998-2000
|
188
|
13
|
15
|
None
|
None
|
|
Cohort 2
|
1999-2001
|
160
|
8
|
5
|
9
|
5
|
|
Cohort 3
|
2000-2002
|
146
|
15
|
4
|
20
|
1
|
|
Cohort 4
|
2001-2003
|
152
|
None
|
None
|
22
|
1
|
|
Cohort 5
|
2002-2004
|
153
|
27
|
3
|
21
|
None
|
|
Cohort 6
|
2003-2005
|
154
|
18
|
2
|
None
|
None
|
|
Cohort 7
|
2004-2006
|
151
|
8
|
3
|
5
|
5
|
|
Cohort 8
|
2005-2007
|
154
|
9
|
4
|
None
|
None
|
|
Cohort 9
|
2006-2008
|
187
|
2
|
10
|
None
|
None
|
|
Cohort 10
|
2007-2009
|
268
|
8
|
13
|
None
|
None
|
|
Cohort 11
|
2008-2010
|
330
|
11
|
13
|
11
|
12
|
UPDATED August 2011
A summary of the most recently available performance measurement results may be
found in a
sample
performance measurement report (PDF, 1.1 MB). Included in the sample report
is an overview of the methodology and design followed for sampling, data collection,
and the cleaning, scoring, and analysis of the HOS data files.
CMS Part C Five Star Quality and Performance Rating System
Results of the HOS survey are included as part of the Medicare Advantage (MA) Part
C Five Star Ratings System that was developed by CMS. As part of the Affordable
Care Act, CMS is rating the relative quality of service of MAOs and rewarding high
performing plans. The star rating system helps Medicare beneficiaries compare MA
plans, helps educate consumers on quality, and makes quality data more transparent
and comparable between plans. Up to 53 quality measures are included in the ratings,
including success in providing preventive services, managing chronic illness, access
to care, Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS®), the MA &
Part D Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) survey,
and responsiveness. Five HOS measures are included in the Part C Star Ratings System:
- Improving or Maintaining Physical Health
- Improving or Maintaining Mental Health
- Monitoring physical activity
- Improving bladder control
- Reducing the risk of falling
The 2012 MA Part C Star Ratings will be used by CMS as the basis for quality bonus
payments in the MA program in the 2013 quality bonus payment year. The HOS
2008-2010
Cohort 11 Merged Baseline and
Follow Up dataset is used to derive
the two functional health status measures and the combined HOS
2010 Cohort 11 Follow
Up and
2010 Cohort 13 Baseline dataset is used to derive the three
2010 HEDIS Effectiveness of Care measures that are incorporated into the 2012 Star
Ratings used for the 2013 quality bonus payments. Beginning with the 2012 Part C
Star Ratings, the Osteoporosis Testing in Older women measure has been retired.
Information about the specific HOS cohorts used in the annual Part C Star Ratings
is available in the Medicare HOS Survey Administration Timeline table on the
Program Overview section.
Information about best practices in promoting quality preventive health care for
the elderly and developing intervention strategies to impact patient outcomes are
available in the 2011 MAO resource guide and 2011 technical report on the functional
status of older adults that are available in the
Real World Uses section. For more information about the Part C Star Ratings
go to the CMS website at
www.cms.gov/PrescriptionDrugCovGenIn/06_PerformanceData.asp.
For any questions related to Part C MA Star Ratings, you may send an e-mail inquiry
directly to
PartCRatings@cms.hhs.gov.
Part D MA Star Rating questions may be sent to
PartDRatings@cms.hhs.gov.